After the year 2012 comes and goes with no dawn of a new age or doom what will be the next date the the woo crowd tries to cash-in on?
I recall first hearing about the year 2012 as it became evident that year 2000 predictions would fail. Have they come up with a date beyond December 23, 2012? According to this fable the Mayans foresaw the end of some cosmic cycle happening on 12/23/12 (not sure what time) Strange how the Mayans never saw the end of their own civilization looming.
My guess is they will amp-up a close pass of an astroid and try to retrofit it into some earlier prediction.
I recall first hearing about the year 2012 as it became evident that year 2000 predictions would fail. Have they come up with a date beyond December 23, 2012? According to this fable the Mayans foresaw the end of some cosmic cycle happening on 12/23/12 (not sure what time) Strange how the Mayans never saw the end of their own civilization looming.
My guess is they will amp-up a close pass of an astroid and try to retrofit it into some earlier prediction.
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 2:05 PMoh well they're already saying that it will be some kind of "shift" or "change." vague enough to apply to anything in a rapidly changing world. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 4:55 PMYeah. Probably they ran out of rock on which to carve the descriptions. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 5:05 PMsomewhat entertainingly there's going to be a total eclipse of the sun in 2012. it's going to be great viewing conditions on the northern tip of australia in queensland. should be an amazing place to view the eclipse, tropical beaches and all. i'm sure there will be a big psytrance party. woo woo central but i'll be there. haha.
-
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 5:48 PM -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 6:13 PMhaha. this is a funny line from the wiki...
"Thus, given the multiplicity of anticipated outcomes of the Harmonic Convergence, its effect on subsequent world history is questionable. Effects on individuals, of course, vary with their experiences and are naturally difficult to confirm." -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 6:59 PMIt is quite strange they (who believe this nonsense) only seem to rely on one tradition / paradigm of Mayan Astrology, that leads to the 2012 conjunction...
-
-
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 8:33 PM<that it will be some kind of "shift" or "change>
yep it's really vague...this 2012 thing.. a shift...wooooo! When isn't there a shift? Things are shifting all the time.
Are these the same people who alleged the same "shift' at the time of the Harmonic Convergence?
A lot of people seem to be champing at the bit for an apocalyptic ending to life on Earth...and yet these same people say they're not christians... I don't get what the rush... sure humans are well able to make Earth uninhabitable for us...but I certainly don't see why it's such a popular fantasy.
Ilike it here on Earth..it seeems like a pretty good planet... sure our species is a violent and backwards one but looking forward to the 'end times' certainly seems a waste of energy...and time. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 9:07 PMperhaps the ennui resulting from modern civilized comfort? no danger, despite the changes in many ways just more of the same until they die. perhaps they long for some vital change, some new thing to occur.
the transhumanists are similar in some ways. what do you guys think about them? oh that's a good topic, i think i'll start another thread.
"I certainly don't see why it's such a popular fantasy. "
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Tue, May 13, 2008 - 6:55 AMI trace this unhealthy apocalyptic urge back to dualism, a la Plato's Idealism, which was taken up by Christianity (but not just by it), then later given a philosophical jumpstart by Descartes (ironically, because in some ways he was a father of modernity), and which persists to this day: the idea that there are two realms of reality, a physical one and a non-physical, "spiritual" or whatever, one, with the non-physical one deemed to be "purer" or more basic somehow, and with the consequence that physical reality, biological reality, etc. are devalued in comparison. The "spiritual" realm is imagined to be the "real" one, with physical reality just an unimportant illusion (Maya?) and an eternal afterlife usually is imagined, as more important than one's actual (finite) life. (Whereas I and a lot of other atheists feel that an awareness of one's finite existence is a very healthy thing which helps one to value reality.) It isn't just the three desert religions that have this dualism, of course, but they seem to have much more of the apocalyptic element. And most of the people talking 2012 trash, while usually not adherents of any of the three, have certainly grown up in the midst of the dualism our "civilization" has inherited from them, which still pervades much of everyday Western thought.
Dualism makes it easier to say oh well, everything will be fixed in the physical world when the big changes originating in the spiritual world manifest at X or Y prophesied date. Another variation is being whisked off to the spiritual world, so it really doesn't matter what happens here in this lowly, impure physical world - the fundies have their "Rapture", but there are New Age analogues as well.
It's a good way to evade responsibility for acting in the here and now to save this planet as it is - the task is all so overwhelming, but it's OK because we're gonna get help from above! Sky Daddy (or similar) will save us helpless kids! I think it's an extremely pernicious, destructive mindset. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Tue, May 13, 2008 - 9:18 AMWell the apocalypse of the Maya had no influence from the western philosophers, yet they believed in Gods and such--just as native americans, African cultures, and many more non-western ones. Spiritual realms where posit way ealier than Plato's time also.
The notion of devaluing or uncaring for the physical realm.. I find very interesting..
I'm thinking of MLK, I do not think he devalued the physical realm... or the story of Jesus when he suggested to love the way we would like to be loved. I don't know how this would lead one to value people less.
I think those who devalue, don't need a reason, but make one up to quiet the emptiness inside or they ignore evidence agaist their mindset--again that cognitive dissonance I refered to earlier.
I am glad that athiest, apparently, don't devalue as much as the theist--althought I am skeptical of that simplistic claim.
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Tue, May 13, 2008 - 9:40 AM<sky daddy> now there's an expression sure to put a smile on a skeptic's face...well at least this skeptic. I'm going to try to see if I can work it into a conversation the next couple of days... I'll let you know if I succeed. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Thu, May 15, 2008 - 11:06 PMdamn....I know I had some opportunities to use the term in the last couple of days..but <sky daddy> just didn't seem quite right..or maybe I forgot to use it in place of "religion".
I'll try this weekend.
-
-
-
-
-
2012 Stuff.. an opportunity to observe cognitive dissonance dynamics
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 7:16 PMThis subject reminds me of some cult members that, upon evidence of fulfilled prophecies, go right along to bolster their original faith with even more fervor--a psychological phenomena of cognitive dissonance.
Unfortunately, cognitive dissonace is something we all have--except those with well trained minds-- thusly is something we all have in common with these "woo" crowds, although perhaps in less obvious ways. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff.. an opportunity to observe cognitive dissonance dynamics
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 7:19 PM -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff.. an opportunity to observe cognitive dissonance dynamics
Sat, May 17, 2008 - 9:07 PMDoes anyone remember that the Rapture was supposed to happen in 1993?
I still recall those signs pasted about the Boston area when I lived there... -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff.. an opportunity to observe cognitive dissonance dynamics
Sun, June 15, 2008 - 8:58 PMSort of like the Great Disappointment of 1844:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grea...ppointment
Then there was the Heaven's Gate "departure" in 1997:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heav...s_group%29
-
Re: 2012 Stuff.. an opportunity to observe cognitive dissonance dynamics
Mon, June 16, 2008 - 10:39 PMYou mean the 1991 film with David Duchovny (before the "X-Files")?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_...%28film%29
-
-
-
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 15, 2008 - 8:52 PMSome articles with helpful background info and healthy skepticism:
The Final Days, by Benjamin Anastas (New York Times Magazine, 7/1/07)
www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01...orld-t.html
Five Years: 2012 and The End of the World As We Know It, by Tom King (Lawrence.com, 12/10/07)
www.lawrence.com/news/2007...ive_years/ -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 15, 2008 - 8:54 PM
-
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 15, 2008 - 8:55 PM"My guess is they will amp-up a close pass of an astroid and try to retrofit it into some earlier prediction."
There's no doubt that the biggest spin/con job on 2012 will occur *after* the fact. (That seems to be a common phenomenon in a lot of mythology-based belief systems.) -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Mon, June 16, 2008 - 8:43 PMTwo things will bing about the end; God, or Mankind himself.
Take a wild guess which one will "end" us first?! -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 9:51 AMI was recently on a tour of the Tulum ruins. Our 100% Mayan guide (so he kept telling us, again and again) was chock full of information on this 2012 ending/change/shift. His belief is that it's the time when the Mayans (who are part of the Marked people--along with some asians, native americans, and some other groups--I was getting confused at this point) will begin to re-establish themselves as leaders of the world--or something like that.
It reminded me of a discussion I once had with an upper caste hindu telling me about the circle and how India once was the cradle of civilization, and will be again in the future. I guess it's a way to be happy with life in the here and now. However, putting a specific date on it, like the Mayan belief, does set one up for dissatisfaction. -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 4:09 PM<<However, putting a specific date on it, like the Mayan belief, does set one up for dissatisfaction.>>
it's a set up for dissatisfaction for some; for others: ridicule, degradation, derision ..etc -
-
Re: 2012 Stuff
Sun, June 22, 2008 - 6:02 PMPoint taken, and a nice one at that:-)
-
-
-
-